Introduction
DPDPA Rights Compliance is the duty of an Enterprise to fairly & lawfully respond to access correction & erasure requests raised by a Data Principal. These Rights arise from the Digital Personal Data Protection Act which requires every Enterprise to maintain transparent data practices, provide timely responses & uphold accountability for how Personal Data is used. In this Article we explore how Enterprises can receive authenticate & fulfil these requests under clear response timelines practical Procedures & Governance Controls. We also look at common challenges & the balance between Individual Rights & Enterprise obligations. This overview helps Readers understand the entire life cycle of DPDPA Rights Compliance from receiving a request to closing the case.
Understanding DPDPA Rights Compliance
DPDPA Rights Compliance refers to the complete set of actions an Enterprise takes to support the lawful exercise of a Data Principal’s Rights. These Rights include the ability to request access to Personal Data, ask for corrections & ask for erasure when data is no longer necessary for Lawful Purposes.
The goal is to maintain Fairness & Trust. Enterprises that manage these Rights effectively reduce legal Risk, protect Data Principals from harm & build reliable digital services. Useful background information is available in publicly accessible sources such as the Digital India website & the official India Code Portal.
Compliance also includes documenting decisions maintaining Audit trails & reporting Breaches or Failures when needed. It is not limited to responding to requests but includes the Systems people & processes that enable reliable outcomes.
Responding to Access Requests
Data Principals can ask Enterprises to confirm if their Personal Data is being processed & request a copy of such data. An access request helps Individuals understand what data exists, why it is being used & how it was obtained.
Enterprises should verify the identity of the requester to prevent wrongful disclosure. After verification they should provide clear information including categories of data processing purposes & any sharing with third parties.
A simple analogy is checking entries in a library card system. The Data Principal wants to know which books are issued in their name, why they were issued & when they are due. Access requests ensure this transparency.
Further reading is available at the National Cyber Security Centre resource hub which offers general principles relevant to Privacy transparency.
Managing Correction Requests
A Data Principal may find that their Personal Data is inaccurate, incomplete or outdated. Under DPDPA Rights, Compliance Enterprises must correct such data without undue delay.
Corrections must be recorded consistently across all systems to avoid fragmented records. If an Enterprise shares data with Partners it should also notify them to update or correct the data. Failing to reflect a correction everywhere can cause Operational issues such as inaccurate billing or misdirected communication.
A good comparison is updating an address across all Service Providers. If only one Provider updates the record & others do not the Data Principal continues to face the same inconvenience.
More guidance on data accuracy principles can be found on the United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Website.
Handling Erasure Requests
Erasure requests ask the Enterprise to remove Personal Data when it is no longer needed for Lawful or Contractual Purposes. If an Enterprise still requires the data for Compliance Tax or Legal Duties it may temporarily refuse but must inform the Data Principal with clear reasons.
Data erasure should follow a controlled workflow that ensures secure deletion metadata updates & verification. Without such processes erased data may reappear through automatic backups or synchronisation systems.
The United States National Institute of Standards & Technology guidance on secure deletion offers useful general principles for responsible disposal of digital information.
Enterprise Governance for DPDPA Rights Compliance
Enterprises must establish internal structures to support DPDPA Rights Compliance such as:
- Defined roles including a Grievance Officer
- Standard Operating Procedures for request handling
- Authentication guidelines for Data Principals
- Record keeping & traceability
- Staff training
These controls ensure consistent responses across Teams & reduce ambiguity. Governance strengthens accountability & prevents delays when multiple departments depend on one another.
Limitations & Counter Considerations
Although DPDPA Rights Compliance promotes transparency some Rights have natural boundaries. Enterprises may deny or limit access when Disclosure Risks harm to another person threatens security or disrupts an investigation.
Erasure is also limited by Legal Retention obligations. For example an Enterprise may need to retain transaction records for Tax Compliance even if a Data Principal requests deletion.
These limitations balance Individual Rights with Public Interest & Lawful Business needs.
Common Challenges & Practical Solutions
Enterprises often face practical challenges such as unclear requests, insufficient identity verification Legacy Systems or inconsistent Data Structures.
To manage these issues Enterprises can:
- Provide Request Templates for clarity
- Use reliable identity verification steps
- Maintain centralised data inventories
- Automate request tracking
External resources like the India Data Governance Quality Framework offer helpful concepts for structured Data Governance.
Conclusion
DPDPA Rights Compliance allows Enterprises to build trust by enabling Data Principals to access, correct & erase their Personal Data. When Enterprises implement structured processes they improve accountability & reduce disputes. Balanced procedures ensure that both Rights & Organisational responsibilities are respected.
Takeaways
- DPDPA Rights Compliance strengthens transparency & fairness.
- Access correction & erasure workflows should be clear & consistent.
- Identity verification protects Data Principals from wrongful disclosure.
- Erasure has lawful limitations but still requires timely communication.
- Governance & training enable smooth & reliable Compliance operations.
FAQ
How does an Enterprise verify a Data Principal’s identity?
Enterprises verify identity through secure methods such as Authentication Tokens, Registered Contact Channels or Official Identification Checks to avoid wrongful disclosure.
What if a Data Principal requests data that the Enterprise does not store?
The Enterprise should inform the Data Principal that the data is not held & provide clarity on what types of data are processed.
Can an Enterprise refuse a Correction request?
An Enterprise may refuse if the data is already accurate or if the request lacks Evidence. It must explain the reason for refusal.
Are Erasure requests always granted?
No. Erasure may be refused if data must be retained for Legal Compliance or Contractual Duties.
How quickly must Enterprises respond to requests?
Enterprises should respond within reasonable timelines defined in their Policies & inform Data Principals of any justified delays.
What happens if wrong data was shared with a Third Party?
The Enterprise should notify the Third Party & request correction or deletion depending on the request.
Why is documentation important in DPDPA Rights Compliance?
Documentation provides proof of actions taken, enables Audits & reduces disputes with Data Principals.
Can an Enterprise charge fees for processing requests?
Enterprises may charge fees only when requests are excessive, repetitive or unreasonable.
Need help for Security, Privacy, Governance & VAPT?
Neumetric provides organisations the necessary help to achieve their Cybersecurity, Compliance, Governance, Privacy, Certifications & Pentesting needs.
Organisations & Businesses, specifically those which provide SaaS & AI Solutions in the Fintech, BFSI & other regulated sectors, usually need a Cybersecurity Partner for meeting & maintaining the ongoing Security & Privacy needs & requirements of their Enterprise Clients & Privacy conscious Customers.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, NIST, HIPAA, HECVAT, EU GDPR are some of the Frameworks that are served by Fusion – a SaaS, multimodular, multitenant, centralised, automated, Cybersecurity & Compliance Management system.
Neumetric also provides Expert Services for technical security which covers VAPT for Web Applications, APIs, iOS & Android Mobile Apps, Security Testing for AWS & other Cloud Environments & Cloud Infrastructure & other similar scopes.
Reach out to us by Email or filling out the Contact Form…
